Pacific Seminar II Lesson Plan - Week #7
From Syllabus: Monday:
Wed: Walden-The Ponds. Env Consulting
V - Chemical Data Analysis, Validation; Ecological & Human
Health Risk Assessment
Friday: Babycakes article. Env Consulting VI - Contaminant
Plumes, Groundwater Flow Models, Exposure Pathways - Specific Example-TCE
degradation & subsequent mobilization, attenuation into a nearby natural wetland
system
Topics/Concepts: Walden; Env Consulting; TCE
Time: 100 minutes * 3
Objective (s):
(i) what the learner should be able to do, specifically -
(ii) under what conditions -
(iii) student centered, active, higher level -
(iv) to what level/degree you will expect outcomes -
(v) measureable -
Pacific Rising Addressed:
1. Expand innovation in academic programs through an ongoing innovation
process, support to pedagogy and research and new education and service delivery
models.
4. Advance faculty teaching, scholarship and research by expanding faculty
development and increasing resources for scholarship and research.
Pac Sem II
Objectives/Course Objectives Addressed:
At a minimum, upon successful completion of this learning opportunity, the
student will:
► make distinct, clear, global connections synthesizing conceptual
frameworks between Pacific Seminar I and II through continuing
the study of the question What is a Good Society?" through
hands-on, contextual discovery in the discipline-specific
perspective of environmental science (the connections will be
measured through formal/informal writing/presenting in/outside of
class and the degree for determining success will be 90% accuracy);
► develop and actively engage in academic/college writing and research skills
appropriate to the high aptitude students at Pacific relatively new to the academe of higher learning within
this writing intensive course (the skills and ability to DO writing will be
measured through formal and informal writing deliverables to the
degree of 90% accuracy for success);
Activities:
1)
One minute paper
2) Muddiest Point
3) Finger Signals
4) Note Comparison/Sharing
5) Work at the Blackboard
Materials:
Procedures: key
higher level questions:
III. Application
(to situations that are new): Predict, Choose, Select, Explain, Identify, Tell.
IV.
Analysis
(breaking down into parts) : Distinguish, What assumptions; What conclusions,
Make a distinction, What is the premise; What ideas apply; What is the function
of; What statement is relevant; State the point of view; What ideas justify the
conclusion; What is the theme; What is the relationship between.
V.
Synthesis
(combining elements into a pattern): Create, How would you test;
Propose an alternative; Solve the following; Plan; Design; Compose; Formulate a
theory, Develop.
VI.
Evaluation
(according to criteria and state reasons): Appraise, Judge, Criticize, Defend,
Compare.
Opening (hook gain their attention and hold it [IP]):
Middle (procedural steps):
Close (what the students have learned; ensure connections):
Follow Up (extend/enrich; transition; advance organizer):
Assessment (relate to
objectives, focus on formative/authentic/active):
Begin class with Post-It Note questions:
1. List two major concepts shared in Fridays newspaper sharing (not of the
persons sitting next to you)
2. Share two possible ways that reading HDT could possibly assist you in your
life if you do not believe there are any, then share two reasons why not.
3. Have you ever been in a chemistry lab? Did you enjoy your experience? What
is the odor that you recall from the lab if you cannot give it a name, please
describe it.
Resources:
|
The concept is interesting, but in order to earn
better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible. Yale management
professor in response to Fred Smith's paper proposing FedEx This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be
considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no
value. Western Union internal memo, 1876 Computers in the future may weigh no more than
1.5 tons. Popular Mechanics, 1949 I think there is a world market for maybe five
computers. Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
640K
ought to be enough for anybody. Bill Gates, 1981 There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home. Ken Olson, president, Digital Equipment Corp., 1977 |